On the spy in Russia

In December 2007, Reshetin was sentenced to 11.5 years in the colony, the chief economist at the Institute Sergei Vizir - for 11 years, deputy chairman of the expert committee, Mikhail Ivanov - to 5 years in penal colony, Assistant Director-General Alexander Rozhkin - to 5 .

February 27 Moscow City Court had to answer the appeal, but due to the large volume of business decision on the appeal was postponed to March 24.

At the press conference were the executive secretary of the Public Committee for the Protection of scientists Ernst Cherny, Academician Yuri Ryzhov, a former director of the Center, ... On. A. Lavochkin Valery Finchenko, lawyer Victor Kononenko, chairman of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Lyudmila Alekseeva, spokesperson of the ...

...

If we talk about the first and the main aspect of our consciousness has introduced the term ' Basmanny justice '. I think we do not have Basmanny justice, and judges have Basmanny. Whatever the defects were not in our legal framework, it does not give grounds to do those outrages which now allow a judge.

The second aspect is completely ignored intelligence conclusions made ​​by experts who know these issues. Special services are based on the opinions of selected 'experts' who often are not.

The third aspect - this is not the first and probably not the last case of this kind. We are aware of the case A. Nikitina, T. Pasko, in. Schurova, B. Soifer, B. Akulicheva On. Kaibyshev, A. Babkin, and many others, when people were convicted on similar charges of approximately. They leave the roots in the 30s, although there is that mass shootings, and no penalty. But if the political parties that call themselves the opposition, are silent about it, if the company is silent, secret service feel unpunished ...

Lawyer Victor Kononenko described the legal side of things. ... Then employees were taken into custody with the main objective to get them to confess. It was, one of the accused - now deceased, in no way acknowledged his guilt, but confirmed that demanded of him, and actually made ​​a confession at all. Then the process continued to brazenly and shamelessly. When we looked at the protocol interrogation of witnesses, they saw that they pereinacheny so that they can be used to charge. Yuri Ryzhov acted as a witness and he could feel the pressure from the judge.

Of course, we will appeal against the sentence, but high hopes are not building. The Court yesterday did not take place - the judge explicitly stated that you should be familiar with the case because, in accordance with normal practice, it has been passed in just three days before. There may be a positive side - the court looks into our arguments, as well as negative - it will find a way to justify the position of the Court of First Instance ...

It struck me, even offended, as a man, 40 years is engaged in these issues.

We do answer the questions: whether the submitted results of dual-use technologies, can we use these results for the production of weapons of mass destruction or their carriers? . The results provided by the Russians, the Chinese side could only be used for verification of some of their facilities - whether to adjust these settings. To extend the results of the tests and calculations for real flying objects, we also need a huge amount of work.

The fact that incriminated Igor Andreevich completely illiterate. Frankly, my colleagues believe that this can put any of us ...

... - ' Espertiza ', which is conducted by the investigative authorities, is fantastic. We met with these experts and found that they have nothing to do with what is judged, and some experts remain anonymous.

We have repeatedly raised the question of the need to involve the examination of such cases specialized branch of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation. Even such a body as a palliative Public Chamber, to which we referred, not knowing who to even ask, has adopted and posted on the sites of the text, but, unfortunately, he was a voice crying in the wilderness. A week ago, the section of the Public Chamber, which deals with the interaction with the security and law enforcement agencies, invited me to their meeting.

Like two years ago, we said that we should change the law, right, examine, and all that.

Impressions about the atmosphere of the trial shared memorialets Gladkikh Nicholas: ... The strategy was to judge whether to pull out any fact, capable of even the slightest compromise of the accused. Four defendants, four defense lawyers, relatives and attending the press just took starve ...

... - When the Soviet era occurred accusations of espionage or divulging state secrets, a man grabbed and more, none of us did not know about it. Maybe his shot, perhaps, given some time. Only in recent years, the Soviet human rights activists have developed a transfer of information from the political camps, and then we learned that not all the ... But nothing definite about them could not figure out - these people were completely dominated by the KGB.

This is not so. There is access to information, there are independent experts, on which we focus, is the Public Committee for the Protection of scientists, who are entering and we Yuri Alekseevich ( Ryzhov ) and Ernst Isaakovich ( Black ). The Committee protects only those whom professionals say they are unjustly condemned, and requires that examinations of such cases have attracted specialists in those narrow areas in which the accused.

Ernst Isaakovich named a list of accused scientists, but only two are sitting - and Valentin Danilov IgorSutyagin. These are now added four more prisoners. But Soifer repelled - were able to prove that the accusation was fake. Or there was collusion between the court and the FSB accused of treason, but give the time below the lower limit on this article. In Moses was 4.5 years, with Pasko - 4, for treason and espionage such terms do not provide. Babkin or sentence - eight years' probation. Another thing is that all these people are innocent, and all these things are in the Strasbourg Court, including Sutyagin and Danilov.

All of these things - Sutyagin, Danilov, Reshetin and his accomplices - occur in the last period of the omnipotence of the Federal Security Service and, therefore, its lawlessness perpetrated. But the publicity that accompanies these processes, fabrication keeps it from a much larger number of such cases. Previously, they were both 5.

Sutyagin case will be considered in Strasbourg soon. The European Court of Human Rights gives defendants typically 5.4 issues. In this case was given 20 questions, and representatives of Russian authorities to respond so that if they wanted to sign his political background, this is it completely failed.

There is another direction of the Committee for Protection of scientists - we turned to the president to pardon Sutyagin and Danilov. But, unfortunately, the current president did not use this right. The effect was even contrary: Sutyagin after the request for clemency was sent to prison vnutrilagernuyu, and Daniel had three penalties - which means that he has no right to ask for early release.

FSB is different hideous revenge, even to those whom it has already rolled over long periods. In these people, it clears for those who managed to wrest from her legs. I think that for Russia, for its population, its prestige, its political and economic stability is the most dangerous organization that it is, it is the security service.

The first thing we do, when you select a new president - we look to him to pardon Danilov and Sutyagin Reshetin and his accomplices. There is a very wrong idea that a person who makes a request for a pardon, I must admit their guilt. It's not in the documents for a pardon, it's a bad Soviet tradition to consider, as if the very fact of the request for clemency, he acknowledges his guilt, even without talking about it.

The main thing - that innocent people were released. Then they, and we will prove that they are innocent ...

Asked by journalists: ... Why judge a person actually engaged in the management contract, and no claims of those who put the signatures and seals? ... Institute, where he worked Sutyagin, evaded security staff, let it take its course and ended it 15 years for Sutyagin.

There are opposite examples. Last year, the Novosibirsk Institute of Kinetics and Combustion, Siberian Branch of RAS Oleg Korobeinichev Head of the Laboratory was accused of divulging state secrets. But he fought like a lion. And he did not throw Institute - he was supported by the Scientific Council and the management of the institute, and had to reverse of the FSB. The case was closed, and apologized to the scientist.

What is the behavior of the FSB? . Also in Novosibirsk in disclosing state secrets accused members of the Institute of Applied Physics, brothers Minins. We dealt with this matter. And I found the publication in Moscow, in the press, in the volumes of ... Russia 's Arms and Technologies ...

We have no other weapons but solidarity and openness.

In conclusion, I would like to give an example of how hip FSB refers to his. In August 2006, was sentenced Colonel Skripal - a scout who has worked in Europe and the English who passed all his known agents in Europe. He was 13 years old. Reshetin, as we see, a little less. Sutyagin, who did not even have access to classified information - 15 years. Danilov, who has written only the terms of reference, a kind of memorandum of understanding - in the long run, too, 13 years. Something to think about? ...

Nicholas Gladkikh,.



Permanent address.

News from Skypecine. com.